Articles

The beginnings of my close connection with the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity are linked to an event that is profoundly tragic, namely the plane crash in Smolensk on 10 April 2010. Among its victims was Minister Andrzej Przewoźnik, who led the negotiations on the Polish side that resulted in the establishment of our Network and was its first Polish coordinator. Andrzej Przewoźnik was an exceptional figure on the Polish political scene, as he effectively directed what we now call the memory policy of this country since the transformation, for nearly twenty years. The uniqueness of his position lay in the fact that he built his unassailable standing in a very divided and contentious political environment and society.

The same plane crash claimed the life of the outstanding Deputy Minister of Culture, Tomasz Merta, who had made the decision just a few days before his tragic death to establish the Secretariat of the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity and to appoint Rafał Rogulski as its director. A few weeks after the deaths of Andrzej Przewoźnik and Tomasz Merta, I was appointed Polish coordinator of the Network by decision of the Minister of Culture, Bogdan Zdrojewski.

Looking back, I believe that in the Network we have not betrayed the legacy of the personalities I have mentioned here, whom we always remember with respect and a sense of loss.

We act with the conviction that international dialogue, even about the most difficult, traumatic events from 20th-century history, based on truth, whose criterion is primarily compliance with the state of scientific research on the subject, can open the way to overcoming the frequent antagonisms, prejudices stemming from the past, and false historical narratives that are so prevalent in Europe now. The aggression of Russia against Ukraine, which we have witnessed for over three years now, is frightening evidence of how a distorted, false Russian vision of history, based on erroneous assumptions, is turning into a dangerous weapon.

Overcoming past conflicts and disputes, to be effective, cannot rely on silence and the denial of uncomfortable facts, but rather on their thorough, mutual understanding and the social internalization of that knowledge. What I am talking about is a process that must last many, many years; for this reason, we have not been, and are not, advocates of imposing on Europe ad hoc, ideologically motivated, supposedly common historical narratives. For the same reason, the members of the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity, while not losing sight of the traditions and interests of their own country, must be apolitical in their own way because, as I mentioned, achieving the goals for which we have been appointed will take much longer than even the longest term of any democratically elected government, and frankly, longer than the duration of our professional life.

We owe our governments gratitude for understanding not only the need for the existence of our Network but also the special conditions of our work mentioned here. I would like to cite the example of Poland: every Polish government we have dealt with has contributed, either organizationally or financially, to increasing the potential of the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity. We owe our gratitude to all six Polish ministers of culture and their excellent collaborators!

However, enough of these rather serious reflections.
I remember the beginnings of the Network's Secretariat, which then consisted of the director, Rafał Rogulski, Agnieszka Mazur-Olczak, who is still with us today, and one more colleague. The Secretariat was then located in two office rooms and was dependent on another Polish cultural institution for organizational and accounting matters, which was inconvenient and burdensome. Today, thanks to the vision of what the Network can and should be, the unwavering energy, and the excellent communication skills of Director Rafał Rogulski, the Institute of the European Network of Remembrance and Solidarity has nearly thirty wonderful collaborators and occupies an entire floor in an office building that itself is a lieu de mémoire of Polish history in the 20th century.

The Network team consists of amazing young and very young people whose skills and talents often simply make me shy. As part of our Network's mission, they have already organized hundreds of events, located between Tbilisi and Barcelona, between Sarajevo and Tirana, as well as Dublin and Helsinki. We have already reached Japan, and soon we will be present at the UN in New York.

I fondly remember our lively discussions with Professor Matthias Weber and Dr. Burkhard Olschowski about what truth in history is and whether it even exists. With gratitude, I recall our meeting with sociologists Dr. Joanna Wawrzyniak and Dr. Małgorzata Pakier, which resulted in the Network initiating a series of annual scientific conferences on memory, history, and memory politics under the collective title Genealogies of Memory. This series, at a time when the concepts of memory politics and historical politics were seen as suspicious and contested, provided the Network with a strong intellectual foundation.

I smile recalling our first trip to the Ústav pamäti národa (the Slovak National Memory Institute) in Bratislava, the Slovak partner of the Network, to discuss the conditions for the practical cooperation that was just beginning. Both we and our Slovak partners and friends assumed that Slovaks and Poles, speaking such closely related languages, would always understand each other, and we did not take care to provide professional translation during the discussions. I remember the shock we experienced when, after exchanging pleasantries, we sat down to discussions and found that we absolutely did not understand the formal legal and financial terminology in our partner's language.

I cannot fail to mention the role of Professor Attila Pók, the first Hungarian coordinator of the Network, who works with us to this day. His vast experience, kindness, and tactfulness have often allowed us to conclude particularly heated debates and find solutions in complicated situations.

I have devoted a considerable, non-negligible part of my professional life and a large part of my heart to the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity. I have been, in part, a participant and, in part, an observer of its emergence, its organizational childhood, and then its creative adulthood. Therefore, allow me to conclude by wishing all its collaborators and friends, as well as myself, that the Network endures and develops not only now, when only hard power is beginning to count in the world, but also when our successors and the successors of our successors take the helm of this organization!